本站 IPV6 地址 blog.kangkang.org

已有 10 条评论

1. forcey

   2008/05/30

   用ipv6留个言试试~~
2. hayate

   2008/05/31

   伟大。
   不过这样是不是比ipv4慢，毕竟tunnel了一下

   不过ipv6用来翻墙真是不错啊
3. kxn

   2008/05/31

   Orz, 后台看到两位的 IP 地址还是 V4 的啊。。
4. kxn

   2008/05/31

   真正从 V6 发个评论试验一下
5. Hakkk

   2008/05/31

   IPv6评论测试～

   这里速度倒一般

   C:\Documents and Settings\Hakkk>ping blog.kangkang.org

   Pinging blog.kangkang.org [2001:470:1f04:228::2] with 32 bytes of data:

   Reply from 2001:470:1f04:228::2: time=405ms
   Reply from 2001:470:1f04:228::2: time=404ms
   Reply from 2001:470:1f04:228::2: time=405ms
   Reply from 2001:470:1f04:228::2: time=405ms

   Ping statistics for 2001:470:1f04:228::2:
   Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
   Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
   Minimum = 404ms, Maximum = 405ms, Average = 404ms
6. kxn

   2008/06/01

   果然是 IPV6 来的~

   你这个是哪里的 tunnel 啊？
7. Hakkk

   2008/06/02

   荷兰SixXS的TB
   http://www.sixxs.net/

   ps，为啥fterm报告bug的那个登录没法找回密码？我输了用户和邮箱，等了一天也没收到密码重置信……
8. ciz

   2008/06/02

   v6 踩过~

   Pinging blog.kangkang.org [2001:470:1f04:228::2] from 2001:da8:SHADOW with 32 bytes of data:

   Reply from 2001:470:1f04:228::2: time=432ms
   Reply from 2001:470:1f04:228::2: time=431ms
   Reply from 2001:470:1f04:228::2: time=432ms
   Reply from 2001:470:1f04:228::2: time=443ms

   Ping statistics for 2001:470:1f04:228::2:
   Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
   Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
   Minimum = 431ms, Maximum = 443ms, Average = 434ms
9. leeight的马甲

   2008/06/03

   IPV6踩一下
10. snow

    2008/11/29

    用国内大学的ISATAP应该会快点吧.